Full side-by-side scores, feature matrix, and verdict.
| Feature | Amper | UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| Monitoring | ||
| Power Monitoring Electrical signature monitoring |
✓ Yes | — — |
| PLC Integration PLC data collection |
✓ Yes - Native | — — |
| Vibration Monitoring Mechanical vibration |
— Not Available | ◑ Partial - Threshold |
| Commercial Terms | ||
| Pricing Subscription |
◑ ~$50/machine/mo | ✓ $20–$125/user/month |
| Hardware Ownership Equipment model |
— Subscription | — — |
| User Accounts Seat pricing |
✓ Unlimited | ◑ Per user |
| Contract Length Commitment |
— — | ◑ Annual (monthly available) |
| CMMS & Monitoring | ||
| Work Order Management CMMS functionality |
— — | ✓ Yes |
| Vibration Monitoring IoT vibration sensor |
— Not Available | ◑ Partial - Threshold |
| Predictive Maintenance Condition-based triggers |
— — | ◑ Partial - CBM |
| Open API Integration access |
— — | ✓ Yes |
Amper is a strong choice for job shops and contract manufacturers needing a broader FactoryOps platform rather than machine monitoring alone. PLC connectivity provides more depth than pure current-sensing competitors.
UpKeep is the right choice for maintenance teams wanting a proven, mobile-first CMMS with basic IoT sensor integration at published SMB-friendly pricing. Not suitable as a standalone machine health or advanced PdM platform.